!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
|
CURRENT RESEARCH PROJECTSLast Updated: May 28, 2019 |
|
Our research focuses on better understanding the chemical composition of the atmosphere, its perturbation by human activity, and the implications for life on Earth. We use advanced global models of atmospheric composition to interpret observations from satellites, aircraft, ground networks, and other platforms. We view our models as part of an integrated observing system bridging the information from different data sets to increase fundamental knowledge and address pressing environmental issues.
|
GLOBAL MODELS. A central tool in our research is the GEOS-Chem global 3-D model of atmospheric composition, developed by a large grass-roots research community at Harvard and elsewhere. See the GEOS-Chem web site for more details. We apply the model to a wide range of atmospheric chemistry problems and lead its development on both scientific and software engingeering fronts. GEOS-Chem provides a cutting-edge tool for modeling atmospheric composition and at the same time a powerful chemical module for Earth System Models to be used in study of chemistry-climate interactions and for chemical data assimilation. |
AIRCRAFT MISSIONS. Aircraft enable detailed chemical characterization of atmospheric composition from the surface to the stratosphere. We have been involved over the years in many aircraft missions in different regions of the world. Our roles include mission design, flight planning, near-real-time model simulations, and post-mission data analysis. We use the GEOS-Chem model to integrate and interpret observations taken from different instruments and from different platforms. |
SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS. Satellites are revolutionizing atmospheric chemistry research by providing global continuous data to inform emission inventories, air quality, climate forcing, and other issues. The data require advanced models for interpretation and we lead the development and application of these models. Our activities include retrievals of satellite spectra using radiative transfer models, inverse model analyses, chemical data assimilation, and Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) for future satellite missions. |
|
|
|
Air quality | Methane | Chemistry-climate | Fires and aerosols | Chemical processes | Model development
AIR QUALITY (subgroup leader: Lu Shen)
TROPOSPHERIC OXIDANTSBACKGROUND:
Tropospheric oxidants (ozone and OH) are of central importance for global atmospheric chemistry. The hydroxyl radical (OH) is the main atmospheric oxidant responsible for removal of atmospheric gases yet we have little understanding of its long-term trends. Ozone is a major greenhouse gas in the middle/upper troposphere, a toxic gas at the surface, and the primary source of OH, but the factors controlling its global trend are poorly understood. Chemical production and loss of ozone and OH involve complex nonlinear mechanisms coupled to transport on all scales. Better understanding this chemistry holds the key to quantifying human influence.
OBJECTIVES:
APPROACH:
PEOPLE: , Yuzhong Zhang, Kelvin Bates
REFERENCES:
Bates, K.H., and D.J. Jacob, An expanded definition of the odd oxygen family for tropospheric ozone budgets: implications for ozone lifetime and stratospheric influence, submitted to Geophys. Res. Lett., 2019. [PDF]
Zhang, Y., D.J. Jacob, J.D. Maasakkers, M.P. Sulprizio, J. Sheng, R. Gautam, and J. Worden, Monitoring global OH concentrations using satellite observations of atmospheric methane , Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15959-15973, 2018. [PDF]
SUPPORT: NASA ACMAP, NASA IDS, HUCE Fellowship to Kelvin Bates
TROPOSPHERIC HALOGEN CHEMISTRYBACKGROUND:
Recent observations indicate high tropospheric concentrations of halogen radicals, leading to oxidant chains and catalytic cycles that have important implications for the global budgets of the main tropospheric oxidants (ozone and OH), the oxidation of mercury, and aerosol formation. Halogen chemistry has in general not been included in global models of tropospheric chemistry because the underlying processes are not well understood.
OBJECTIVES:
APPROACH:
PEOPLE: Xuan Wang
COLLABORATORS: Sebastian Eastham (MIT), Mat Evans and Tomas Sherwen (U. York), Becky Alexander (U. Washington)
REFERENCES:
Wang, X., D.J. Jacob, M.P. Sulprizio, S.D. Eastham, L. Zhu, Q. Chen, B. Alexander, T. Sherwen, M.J. Evans, B.H. Lee, J.D. Haskins, F.D. Lopez-Hilfike, J.A. Thornton, G.L. Huey, and H. Liao, The role of chlorine in global tropospheric chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3981-4003, 2019.[PDF]
Zhu, L., D. J. Jacob, S. D. Eastham, M. P. Sulprizio, X. Wang, T. Sherwen, M. J. Evans, Q. Chen, B. Alexander, T. K. Koening, R. Volkamer, L. G. Huey, M. Le Breton, T. J. Bannan, and C. J. Percival, Effect of sea-salt aerosol on tropospheric bromine chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6497-6507, 2019. [PDF]
SUPPORT: National Science Foundation, JLAQC
AIR QUALITY IN CHINABACKGROUND:
Air quality in China is among the worst in the world and the Chinese government has declared a "war on air pollution" involving massive controls on emissions. Newly installed surface air quality networks together with satellite observations allow us to track the evolution of Chinese air quality and the responses to emission controls, and in this manner to build our understanding of the unique Chinese air pollution environment..
OBJECTIVES:
APPROACH:
PEOPLE: Ke Li, Lu Shen, Xuan Wang, Viral Shah, Jonathan Moch, Shixian Zhai
REFERENCES:
Shen, L., D.J. Jacob, L. Zhu, Q. Zhang, B. Zheng, M.P. Sulprizio, K. Li, I. De Smedt, G. Gonzalo Abad, H. Cao, T.-M. Fu, and H. Liao, 2005-2016 trends of formaldehyde columns over China observed by satellites: increasing anthropogenic emissions of volatile organic compounds and decreasing agricultural fire emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 4468-4475, 2019. [PDF]
Zhai, S., D.J. Jacob, X. Wang, L. Shen, K. Li, Y. Zhang, K. Gui, T. Zhao, and H. Liao, Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) trends in China, 2013-2018: contributions from meteorology, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-2792019, in review, 2019. [PDF]
Shen, L., D.J. Jacob, X. Liu, G. Huang, K. Li, and H. Liao, Spatial distribution and temporal trend of ozone pollution in China observed with the OMI satellite instrument, 2005-2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6551-6560, 2019. [PDF]
Li, K., D.J. Jacob, H. Liao, L. Shen, Q. Zhang, and K.H. BatesAnthropogenic drivers of 2013-2017 trends in summer surface ozone in China, PNAS, 116, 422-427, 2019. [PDF]
SUPPORT: JLAQC, NASA Aura, Harvard Global Institute
COLLABORATORS: Hong Liao (NUIST)
AIR QUALITY IN THE UNITED STATESBACKGROUND:
Air quality in the US has been steadily improving but surface concentrations of ozone and particulate matter (PM) still exceed air quality standards. Emission control strategies that have been successful in the past may not be as successful in the future as chemical regimes change and as natural emissions and international transport of pollution become more important. There is also large uncertainty surrounding emissions and trends of nitrogen oxides (NOx), which are key precursors for ozone and PM. We need to better understand what controls ozone and PM in the present day and the implications for meeting the standards.
OBJECTIVES:
APPROACH:
PEOPLE: Rachel Silvern, Katherine Travis (now at NASA Langley)
REFERENCES:
Silvern, R.F., D.J. Jacob, L.J. Mickley, M.P. Sulprizio, K.R. Travis, E.A. Marais, R.C. Cohen, J.L. Laughner, S. Choi, J. Joiner, and L.N. Lamsal, Using satellite observations of tropospheric NO2 columns to infer long-term trends in US NOx emissions: the importance of accounting for the free tropospheric NO2 background, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-168, in review, 2019. [PDF]
Travis, K.R., and D.J. Jacob,Systematic bias in evaluating chemical transport models with maximum daily 8-hour average (MDA8) surface ozone for air quality applications, Geophys. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-78, in review, 2019. [PDF]
SUPPORT: NASA Aura, EPA
ORGANIC CHEMISTRYBACKGROUND:
The atmospheric chemistry of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) has major implications for oxidant concentrations and for formation of organic aerosol. VOCs are emitted from a range of biogenic and anthropogenic sources. They undergo various oxidation cascades in the atmosphere, producing increasingly substituted and cleaved compounds, terminating eventually in the formation of CO2 or the removal by deposition. Most of the species and reactions involved have never been measured and must be inferred indirectly. Multigenerational products of VOC oxidation may be responsible for an "organic soup" in the remote troposphere that is suggested by observations but not understood at all. Representing organic chemistry in models is a major challenge.
OBJECTIVES:
APPROACH:
PEOPLE: Kelvin Bates
REFERENCES:
Bates, K.H., and D.J. Jacob, A new model mechanism for atmospheric oxidation of isoprene: global effects on oxidants, nitrogen oxides, organic products, and secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-328, in review, 2019. [PDF]
SUPPORT: NASA ACMAP, HUCE fellowship to Kelvin Bates
Back to projects list
MERCURY CHEMISTRYBACKGROUND:
Mercury deposition to ecosystems results in accumulation of toxic forms of mercury up the food chain. Mercury is emitted to the atmosphere mostly as Hg(0), and is oxidized in the atmosphere to Hg(II) which can be rapidly deposited but also reduced back to Hg(0). Understanding atmospheric Hg(0)/Hg(II) redox chemistry is crucial to predicting the patterns of mercury deposition and the subsequent biogeochemical cycling.
OBJECTIVES:
APPROACH:
PEOPLE: Colin Thackray
COLLABORATORS: Elsie Sunderland (Harvard), Alfonso Saiz-Lopez (CSIC)
REFERENCES:
Saiz-Lopez, A., S.P. Sitkiewicz, D. Roca-Sanjuan, J.M. Oliva-Enrich, J.Z. Davalos, R. Notario, M. Jiskra, Y. Xu, F. Wang, C.P. Thackray, E.M. Sunderland, D.J. Jacob, O. Tratnikov, C.A. Cuevas, A.U. Acuna, D. Rivero, J.M.C. Plane, D.E. Kinnison, and J.E. Sonke, Photoreduction of gaseous oxidized mercury changes global atmospheric mercury speciation, transport and deposition, Nature Comm., 9, 4796, 2018. [PDF]
SUPPORT: NSF
Back to projects list
UNDERSTANDING METHANE
EMISSIONSBACKGROUND:
Methane is the second most important anthropogenic greenhouse gas after CO2. It is particularly important for near-term (~20 years) climate change. Methane is emitted by a wide range of processes including oil/gas systems, livestock, landfills, wastewater, rice cultivation, and wetlands. The magnitudes of these sources, their spatial distributions, and their temporal trends are poorly understood. Improving methane emission inventories is imperative for climate policy.
OBJECTIVES:
APPROACH:
PEOPLE: Tia Scarpelli, Melissa Sulprizio, Kyle Delwiche
COLLABORATORS: Ritesh Gautam (EDF), Elsie Sunderland (Harvard)
REFERENCES:
A global, gridded inventory of methane emissions from fuel exploitation based on national reports to the UNFCCC , presented by Tia Scarpelli at the AGU 2018 Fall Meeting, Washington DC, December 2018. [PDF]
SUPPORT: NASA CMS, NASA IDS, Harvard Climate Initiative, NDSEG fellowship to Tia Scarpelli
INFERRING GLOBAL METHANE EMISSIONS FROM ATMOSPHERIC OBSERVATIONSBACKGROUND:
Satellite observations of atmospheric methane can test emission inventories and diagnose the causes of concentration trends. This involves statistical inversion of chemical transport models that relate emissions to concentrations. Satellites are now providing global continuous observations of methane that deliver powerful constraints on methane emissions worldwide. This information can be exploited to improve national emission inventories reported in international climate policy agreements and to identify targets for reducing methane emissions. The TROPOMI instrument launched in October 2017 promises to revolutionize our ability to map methane emissions from space by provding daily global coverage of methane concentrations. New satellite observations available in the thermal IR may improve our ability to constrain trends in emissions and OH (the main methane sink).
OBJECTIVES:
APPROACH:
Develop new inverse methods to exploit the high density of observations from TROPOMI;
Determine the complementary information from satellite observations in the thermal IR (AIRS, CrIS) and from surface observations (NOAA network).
PEOPLE: Bram Maasakkers (now at SRON), Melissa Sulprizio, Yuzhong Zhang, Hannah Nesser, Elise Penn
COLLABORATORS: Melissa Weitz (EPA), Tom Wirth (EPA), Anthony Bloom (JPL), John Worden (JPL), Ilse Aben (SRON)
REFERENCES:
Maasakkers, J.D., D.J. Jacob, M.P. Sulprizio, T. Scarpelli, H. Nesser, J.-X. Sheng, Y. Zhang, M. Hersher, A.A. Bloom, K.W. Bowman, J.R. Worden, G. Janssens-Maenhout, and R.J. Parker, Global distribution of methane emissions, emission trends, and OH concentrations and trends inferred from an inversion of GOSAT satellite data for 2010-2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-1365, in review, 2019. [PDF]
SUPPORT: NASA CMS, NASA IDS, NSF fellowship to Hannah Nesser, NSF fellowship to Elise Penn
DETECTING METHANE POINT SOURCES FROM SPACEBACKGROUND:
Anthropogenic emissions of methane come from a very large number of relatively small point sources including coal mine vents, oil/gas processing facilities, stockyards, landfills, etc. These sources have highly variable emissions, and can spike under abnormal conditions. Satellites provide a vantage point for continuous monitoring of these point sources and detecting emission spikes. Pixel resolution, precision, and return time can however limit the information from a satellite instrument. Quantitative interpretation of the observed turbulent plume in terms of a point emission rate is not a trivial problem.
OBJECTIVES:
APPROACH:
PEOPLE: Daniel Varon, Hannah Nesser, Dan Cusworth (now at JPL).
COLLABORATORS: Jason McKeever (GHGSat, Inc.), Cynthia Randles, Laurent White, Jeremry Boardman (Exxon Mobil)
REFERENCES:
Cusworth, D.H., D.J. Jacob, D.J. Varon, C. Chan Miller, X. Liu, K. Chance, A.K Thorpe3, R.M. Duren, C.E. Miller, D.R. Thompson, C. Frankenberg, L. Guanter, and C.A. Randles, Potential of next-generation imaging spectrometers to detect and quantify methane point sources from space, submitted to Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2019.
Varon, D.J., J. McKeever, D. Jervis, J.D. Maasakkers, S. Pandey, S. Houweling, I. Aben, T.R. Scarpelli, and D.J. Jacob, Satellite discovery of anomalously large methane point sources from oil/gas production, submitted to Geophys. Res. Lett., 2019.
Varon, D.J., D.J. Jacob, J. McKeever, D. Jervis, B.O.A. Durak, Y. Xia, and Y. Huang, Quantifying methane point sources from fine-scale (GHGSat) satellite observations of atmospheric methane plumes, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 5673-5686, 2018. [PDF]
SUPPORT: GHGSat, Inc., Exxon Mobil, NASA CMS
GEOS-Chem AS CHEMICAL MODULE FOR EARTH SYSTEM MODELS AND MASSIVELY PARALLEL APPLICATIONSBACKGROUND:
Earth System Models (ESMs) used for climate simulations, seasonal forecasting, and data assimilation do not include detailed atmospheric chemistry because of the perceived complexity and computational cost. Yet atmospheric chemistry is key to climate forcing and air quality forecasting, and is also needed for assimilation of chemical observations from satellites. The software architecture needed to couple chemical modules in ESMs also allows massively parallel chemical transport modeling using the Message Passing Interface (MPI) protocol. This provides the basis for the high-performance version of GEOS-Chem (GCHP).
OBJECTIVES:
APPROACH:
PEOPLE: Lizzie Lundgren, Sebastian Eastham (now at MIT), GEOS-Chem Support Team
COLLABORATORS: Steven Pawson (NASA/GSFC), Christoph Keller (NASA/GSFC), Randall Martin (Dalhousie)
REFERENCES:
GEOS-Chem and MUSICA , presented by Daniel Jacob at the NCAR MUSICA Workshop, Boulder, May 21, 2019. [PDF]
Eastham, S.D., M.S. Long, C.A. Keller, E. Lundgren, R.M. Yantosca, J. Zhuang, C. Li, C.J. Lee, M. Yannetti, B.M. Auer, T.L. Clune, J. Kouatchou, W.M. Putman, M.A. Thompson, A.L. Trayanov, A.M. Molod, R.V. Martin, and D.J. Jacob, GEOS-Chem High Performance (GCHP): A next-generation implementation of the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model for massively parallel applications, Geosci. Mod. Dev., 11, 2941-2953, 2018. [PDF].
Hu, L., C.A. Keller, M.S. Long, T. Sherwen, B. Auer, A. Da Silva, J.E. Nielsen, S. Pawson, M.A. Thompson, A.L. Trayanov, K.R. Travis, S.K. Grange, M.J. Evans, and D.J. Jacob, Global simulation of tropospheric chemistry at 12.5 km resolution: performance and evaluation of the GEOS-Chem chemical module (v10-1) within the NASA GEOS Earth System Model (GEOS-5 ESM), Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-111, in review, 2018. [PDF]
SUPPORT: NSF, NASA MAP, NASA ACMAP, JLAQC
GEOS-Chem ON THE CLOUDBACKGROUND:
Cloud computing can allow GEOS-Chem users worldwide to run the model with no local hardware or systems support, and no installation or compilation of the code. Users can instead access the standard configuration of the model through the cloud and execute it for their application. They can also download the model and its environment from the cloud, ensuring compatibility with their local system. This has many advantages in terms of computing cost, model access, user support, reproducibility of results, and traceability of the standard model.
OBJECTIVES:
APPROACH:
PEOPLE: Jiawei Zhuang, Bob Yantosca, Judit Flo-Gaya
COLLABORATORS: Amazon Web Services
REFERENCES:
Zhuang, J., D.J. Jacob, J. Flo-Gaya, R.M. Yantosca, E.W. Lundgren, M.P. Sulprizio, and S.D. Eastham, Enabling immediate access to Earth science models through cloud computing: application to the GEOS-Chem model, Bull. Amer. Met. Soc., in press, 2019. [PDF]
SUPPORT: NASA ACMAP, NASA fellowship to Jiawei Zhuang
CHEMICAL SOLVERSBACKGROUND:
Chemical mechanisms for atmospheric chemistry include hundreds of species interacting by kinetic equations on time scales ranging from less than a second to many years. Integration of these equations with numerical solvers is extremely expensive. This limits the level of chemical detail that can be afforded in atmospheric chemistry models, the spatial resolution of these models, and the inclusion of atmospheric chemistry in Earth System Models.
OBJECTIVE:
APPROACH:
PEOPLE: Lu Shen, Makoto Kelp
COLLABORATORS: Christoph Keller (NASA/GSFC), Nathan Kutz (U. Washington)
REFERENCES:
SUPPORT: NASA MAP